Corma versus Cakewalk
Looking for a more holistic alternative to Cakewalk?
Managing access to applications across your organization has become one of the most critical challenges in modern IT. With SaaS adoption accelerating and AI tools infiltrating corporate environments, choosing the right identity access management platform can determine whether your company thrives or drowns in software chaos.
This comprehensive comparison breaks down everything you need to know about Corma and Cakewalk to help you make an informed decision for your organization.
.png)
Cakewalk, founded in 2022 and headquartered in Berlin, Germany, is a provider of cloud‑based identity governance and access management solutions, offering automated access provisioning, AI‑driven discovery of apps and AI agents, and compliance‑focused access controls to streamline IAM workflows and enhance security for IT and InfoSec teams
Mid-size and large enterprises
2022 in Berlin
The Comparison
Understanding the differences between these platforms helps you understand which aligns better with your operations and future needs.
Comprehensive governance platform with full lifecycle management
Streamlined access management with modular feature selection
Addresses broader SaaS sprawl challenges beyond just access
Focuses primarily on user provisioning and access control
All-in-one solution to replace fragmented tool stacks
Essential IAM functionality without feature complexity
Deep automation for reviews, provisioning, and cost control
Basic automation for core access management tasks
These results reflect performance improvements achieved through the use of Corma for SaaS management and automation.
Automation
employees onboarded and offboarded automatically
Time spent
spent less with Corma per week for management
Cost Efficiency
saved monthly by optimizing SaaS licences
Implementation Requirements Overview
Getting either platform up and running requires different levels of commitment and resources.
Corma Setup:
- More comprehensive setup but includes advanced automation features
- Requires more initial configuration for full governance benefits
- Deeper integration with active directory and identity providers
- Time investment pays off with long-term operational efficiency
Cakewalk implementation:
- Simpler implementation with faster time-to-value
- Quick deployment with immediate access management results
- Less configuration overhead for basic provisioning needs
- Ideal for teams wanting to get started without extensive planning
Pricing and Business Model
The pricing reflects each platform’s target audience:
Corma: Designed for growing IT teams and mid-sized organizations, Corma focuses on delivering ROI through automated SaaS governance, license optimization, and operational efficiency. Pricing is available on request and structured to remain accessible without the overhead or complexity of enterprise-heavy platforms.
Cakewalk: Designed for fast-moving companies and growing teams, Cakewalk focuses on automated identity and access management, AI-driven provisioning, and compliance simplification. Pricing is available on request, structured to remain flexible and accessible without the complexity of traditional enterprise IAM platforms.
What makes Corma more secure than Cakewalk?
Corma emphasizes strict SaaS identity and access controls; Cakewalk emphasizes automated access governance across identities and apps.
How do Corma and Cakewalk differ on spend control?
Corma directly cuts SaaS license waste; Cakewalk tracks access and tools to help reduce redundant apps.
Can Corma help with EU data privacy better than Cakewalk?
Yes, Corma’s EU‑focused SaaS governance is more targeted; Cakewalk focuses on access management.
