Corma versus Najar
Looking for a more holistic alternative to Najar?
Managing a growing stack of software applications has become one of the most complex challenges facing modern businesses. With the average company now using over 100 SaaS tools, choosing the right platform to govern them all can make or break your operational efficiency.
Corma and Najar Ex Welii (formerly operating as Welii) represent two distinct approaches to solving the SaaS sprawl problem. While both fall under the umbrella of saas management platforms, they cater to fundamentally different organizational priorities. This comparison will help you understand which solution aligns with your specific needs.
This comparison breaks down how these platforms differ so you can determine which one is the best fit for your organization’s specific SaaS governance needs.
Najar, formerly known as Welii, is primarily a procurement tool designed to streamline the purchasing process within organizations. Najar offers a platform that streamlines SaaS purchasing for Finance and IT teams. It centralizes SaaS purchases through approval workflows, qualitative benchmarks, and briefings. The goal is to help employees make better purchasing decisions and manage their needs.
Big Mid-size and large enterprises
2021 in Paris
The Comparison
The explosion of remote work post-2020 accelerated SaaS adoption at unprecedented rates, overwhelming IT and finance teams with shadow IT, unchecked renewals, and dormant licenses draining budgets. Selecting the right management platform isn’t just about features—it’s about matching the tool to your organization’s primary pain points.
Corma positions itself as a comprehensive solution for identity access management, unifying license administration, access provisioning, and compliance enforcement. Najar Ex Welii takes a procurement-first approach, centralizing SaaS purchasing through approval workflows and vendor negotiations.By the end of this guide, you’ll have a clear picture of which platform offers the capabilities your teams need most.
Advanced
Limited
Full implementation
Not primary focus
Comprehensive
Basic
Yes
No
Yes
Partial
GDPR-compliant
Limited
Core feature
Secondary
These results reflect performance improvements achieved through the use of Corma for SaaS management and automation.
Automation
employees onboarded and offboarded automatically
Time spent
spent less with Corma per week for management
Cost Efficiency
saved monthly by optimizing SaaS licences
Implementation Requirements Overview
Getting either platform up and running requires different levels of commitment and resources.
Corma Setup:
- Deployment timeline typically measured in days to weeks for SMBs
- Integration with existing identity providers and HR systems
- Configuration of RBAC policies and approval workflows
- User training focused on self-service access requests
- Ongoing maintenance primarily automated through the platform
Najar Ex Welii Implementation:
- Longer onboarding process suited for enterprise complexity
- Integration with finance systems and expense tracking tools
- Setup of approval workflows aligned with procurement processes
- Training for finance and IT teams on benchmark utilization
- Account manager coordination for active vendor negotiations
Pricing and Business Model
The pricing reflects each platform’s target audience:
Corma: Designed for growing IT teams and mid-sized organizations, Corma focuses on delivering ROI through automated SaaS governance, license optimization, and operational efficiency. Pricing is available on request and structured to remain accessible without the overhead or complexity of enterprise-heavy platforms.
Najar: Geared toward organizations seeking broader procurement visibility and vendor management capabilities, Najar’s pricing typically aligns with companies investing in centralized purchasing and spend control. For teams prioritizing structured procurement workflows and vendor oversight, the platform’s cost can be justified by improved negotiation leverage and process standardization.
What’s the key difference between Corma and Najar?
Corma focuses on identity and access management (IAM) and license automation, while Najar is built for SaaS procurement and vendor contract negotiations.
Is Corma better than Najar for SaaS access and license control?
Yes — Corma offers advanced user provisioning, RBAC, and license lifecycle automation, which Najar lacks in its procurement-first approach.
Can Corma replace Najar for software spend optimization?
Yes — Corma optimizes SaaS spend by automating license management and eliminating unused tools, without relying on complex vendor negotiations.
Which is more cost-effective for SaaS management: Corma or Najar?
Corma is more affordable for SMBs seeking automation and access control, while Najar suits larger companies focused on centralized SaaS procurement.
