Corma versus Torii
Looking for a more holistic alternative to Torii?
Corma and Torii are both SaaS Management Platforms, but they solve SaaS sprawl in fundamentally different ways.Corma is a European, identity-first SaaS Management Platform designed to control access, automate compliance, and reduce SaaS spend through governance.
Torii is a traditional SaaS Management Platform focused on discovery, workflows, and operational visibility across SaaS applications.
Discover how these solutions compare and which might be the best fit for your organization's needs.
Torii, is a standard SaaS management solution designed to help organizations discover, optimize, and control their SaaS usage and costs. Headquartered in New York with a global presence, Torii offers an open platform that leverages open APIs and a robust developer community to manage entire SaaS stacks efficiently. The platform excels in automating workflows, reducing manual tasks, and providing real-time visibility into software usage and expenses. Torii's mission is to empower modern IT departments by enhancing SaaS governance, ensuring compliance, and driving business growth through innovative SaaS management practices.
Mid-size and large enterprises
2017 by Uri Haramati, Tal Bereznitskey, and Uri Nativ
The Comparison
In SaaS management, Corma and Torii stand out as two leading solutions, each offering unique advantages tailored to different organizational needs. Corma excels in identity access management (IAM), providing a unified platform that simplifies the administration of software licenses and access, thereby enhancing productivity and security. Its robust compliance features ensure that organizations adhere to regulatory requirements while maintaining a secure digital environment. In contrast, Torii offers a comprehensive SaaS management solution designed to automate workflows, reduce manual tasks, and provide real-time visibility into software usage and expenses. This comparison highlights the key differences between Corma and Torii, helping organizations determine which platform best aligns with their SaaS management goals and operational requirements.
Identity-first
Operations & workflow-first
Via identity & access
Via integrations
Native
Limited / indirect
Built-in
Partial
Built-in
Not available
Identity-based
Discovery-based
IT, Security, Compliance
IT Ops, SaaS Ops
These results reflect performance improvements achieved through the use of Corma for SaaS management and automation.
Automation
employees onboarded and offboarded automatically
Time spent
spent less with Corma per week for management
Cost Efficiency
saved monthly by optimizing SaaS licences
Implementation Requirements Overview
Getting either platform up and running requires different levels of commitment and resources.
Corma Setup:
- Deployment timeline typically measured in days to weeks for SMBs
- Integration with existing identity providers and HR systems
- Configuration of RBAC policies and approval workflows
- User training focused on self-service access requests
- Ongoing maintenance primarily automated through the platform
Torii Setup:
- Deployment typically completed in days to weeks for SMBs
- Workflows configured for onboarding, offboarding, access, and license lifecycle
- Training focused on SaaS visibility, spend tracking, and automation
- Maintenance supported by automated usage syncs and continuous discovery
Pricing and Business Model
The pricing reflects each platform’s target audience:Corma Setup:
Corma: Designed for growing IT teams and mid-sized organizations, Corma focuses on delivering ROI through automated SaaS governance, license optimization, and operational efficiency. Pricing is available on request and structured to remain accessible without the overhead or complexity of enterprise-heavy platforms.
Torii: Entry pricing is available via a custom quote. The platform supports identity discovery, granular access controls, automated certifications, audit-ready reporting, and identity lifecycle automation for IGA. For SMP, it provides app discovery, license and renewal workflows, expense and contract integrations, and license optimization insights. Organizations benefit from improved SaaS governance, spend visibility, and streamlined license and access management.
What makes Corma’s approach to software license management different from Torii?
Corma focuses on automating license provisioning alongside identity management, which streamlines access control and reduces SaaS waste more effectively than Torii’s broader automation platform.
How do Corma and Torii handle SaaS contract management and vendor negotiations?
Both Corma and Torii centralize SaaS contract management to improve visibility and control, but neither platform offers direct vendor negotiation services.
Can Corma improve regulatory compliance better than Torii?
Yes, Corma’s automated access reviews and strict control over application usage help organizations maintain ongoing compliance, especially for industries with heavy regulatory demands.
Which platform offers a better fit for organizations wanting granular control over user access?
Corma provides deeper customization for user access management, making it ideal for companies needing strict governance, while Torii emphasizes overall SaaS visibility and usage optimization.
