Looking for a more holistic alternative to Cledara?
Corma and Cledara are both SaaS management platforms, each offering unique strengths tailored to different organizational needs. Cledara excels in providing a centralized hub for managing all SaaS subscriptions, offering a user-friendly interface that simplifies the monitoring of usage, expenses, and renewals. This platform is ideal for organizations looking to gain comprehensive visibility and control over their SaaS stack, ensuring regulatory compliance and optimizing costs. On the other hand, Corma stands out in identity access management (IAM), offering a unified platform that streamlines the administration of software licenses and access. Corma's focus on IAM enhances productivity and security, making it a robust solution for organizations seeking to manage software licenses efficiently while adhering to regulatory requirements, including GDPR compliance.
Discover how these platforms compare and which might best suit your organization's needs for effective SaaS governance.
Cledara isa SaaS management platform designed to help organizations manage their software subscriptions efficiently. Headquartered in London, Cledara offers a centralized hub for managing all SaaS subscriptions, providing visibility into software usage, expenses, and renewals. The platform is known for its user-friendly interface and strong compliance features, ensuring that all software subscriptions adhere to regulatory standards. Cledara's mission is to help companies stay on top of their SaaS tools while providing the flexibility to move fast and register for the tools they need, making it an ideal solution for organizations looking to optimize their SaaS management processes.
Scope
Mid-size and large enterprises
Founded
2018 by Cristina Vila and Brad van Leeuwen
In IT Governance around managing software, Corma and Cledara emerge as two prominent solutions, each catering to distinct organizational needs. Corma excels in identity access management (IAM), offering a unified platform that streamlines the administration of software licenses and access, thereby enhancing productivity and security. Its robust compliance features ensure that organizations adhere to regulatory requirements, including GDPR, while maintaining a secure digital environment. In contrast, Cledara provides a comprehensive SaaS management platform designed to centralize and manage all SaaS subscriptions efficiently. Known for its user-friendly interface and strong compliance features, Cledara ensures visibility into software usage, expenses, and renewals, making it ideal for optimizing SaaS management processes.
While you might say we are biased, this comparison has the goal to show the unique strengths of Corma and Cledara, helping organizations identify which platform best aligns with their SaaS management goals and operational needs.
Managing expenses around software
Provides real-time visibility into SaaS spending but may require additional integrations for comprehensive cost management.
Offers efficient cost management by simplifying software license administration and reducing unnecessary expenses
Identity Access Management
Focuses more on SaaS management and automation, with less emphasis on comprehensive IAM
Excels in managing software licenses and access, providing a unified platform for streamlined IAM
For ISO 27001, SOC 2 and other certifications.
Offers compliance features but may not integrate as seamlessly with existing security frameworks
Ensures robust compliance and security by streamlining access to necessary applications and maintaining control over application usage
Employee experience in the worksplace of tomorrow
Provides a user-friendly interface that simplifies the management of SaaS subscriptions for IT teams but to a lesser extent to end users
Enhances productivity by removing barriers to accessing essential tools, leading to higher satisfaction
Automating workflows around licence management
Automates the discovery, spend optimization, operations, and compliance of SaaS applications
Automates provisioning and request processes, reducing manual effort and improving efficiency
Adaptability for organisations with up to a few hundred users
Tailored for larger enterprises. Can be costly and very complex for smaller organizations
Delivers a cost-effective solution tailored for SMBs
Corma and Cledara, both offering features around SaaS management, offer distinct features and advantages tailored to different organizational needs. This is especially visibile when it comes to Identity Access Management where Corma has a wider set of features than Cledara. Here are the key differences between the two:
1. Identity Access Management (IAM):
Corma excels in managing software licenses and access, providing a unified platform that simplifies IAM processes. This focus on IAM helps organizations streamline access to necessary applications, enhancing productivity and security. Corma's strength in this area makes it a more efficient alternative for automatically provisioning software licenses compared to platforms like Cledara.
2. Cost Management and Optimization:
Corma addresses core needs such as cost management and productivity enhancement in SaaS environments. By simplifying software license administration, Corma helps organizations reduce unnecessary expenses and optimize their SaaS spending. This comprehensive approach to cost management sets Corma apart from Cledara, which also offers cost optimization but may require additional integrations for a similar level of detail.
3. Compliance and Security:
Corma ensures robust compliance and security by maintaining control over application usage and data security through automated access reviews. This focus on compliance helps organizations adhere to regulatory requirements while providing a secure digital working environment. Corma's emphasis on compliance and security makes it a reliable choice for organizations looking to enhance their SaaS governance.
4. User Experience and Engagement:
Corma enhances user experience by removing barriers to accessing essential tools, leading to higher job satisfaction and engagement. By streamlining access request processes, Corma reduces manual effort and improves efficiency, contributing to a more productive work environment. This user-centric approach differentiates Corma from Cledara, which also aims to improve user experience but may not offer the same level of customization for access requests.
These differences highlight Corma's strengths in managing identity access, optimizing costs, ensuring compliance, and enhancing user experience within SaaS environments. Organizations seeking a comprehensive solution for SaaS management and governance may find Corma to be a more efficient and effective choice compared to Cledara.
%20(1).png)
