Corma versus Zluri
Looking for a more holistic alternative to Zluri?
Corma and Zluri are both SaaS Management Platforms, but they take fundamentally different approaches to managing SaaS sprawl, cost, and risk.Corma is a European, identity-first SaaS Management Platform focused on access governance, compliance, and cost control through identity.
Zluri is a discovery- and spend-first SaaS Management Platform focused on SaaS visibility, license optimization, and portfolio insights.
Discover how these platforms compare and which might best suit your organization's needs for effective SaaS governance.
Zluri is a comprehensive SaaS management solution designed to help organizations optimize their SaaS usage and costs. With a strong focus on providing detailed analytics and insights into software licenses, usage patterns, and compliance, Zluri enables IT teams to make data-driven decisions. The platform features a robust reporting suite and an intuitive dashboard, allowing for seamless management of SaaS applications and ensuring regulatory adherence. Zluri's emphasis on discovery and management of SaaS applications makes it a reliable choice for organizations seeking to streamline their SaaS operations and enhance governance.
Mid-size and large enterprises
2020 by Sethu Meenakshisundaram, Ritish Reddy, and Chaithanya Yambari
The Comparison
In SaaS management, Corma and Zluri stand out as two leading solutions, each offering unique advantages tailored to different organizational needs. Corma excels in identity access management (IAM), providing a unified platform that simplifies the administration of software licenses and access, thereby enhancing productivity and security. Its robust compliance features ensure that organizations adhere to regulatory requirements while maintaining a secure digital environment. In contrast, Zluri offers a comprehensive SaaS management solution designed to automate workflows, reduce manual tasks, and provide real-time visibility into software usage and expenses. This comparison highlights the key differences between Corma and Zluri, helping organizations determine which platform best aligns with their SaaS management goals and operational requirements.
Identity-first
Discovery & spend-first
Via identity & access
Via integrations & finance data
Native
Limited / indirect
Built-in
Partial
Built-in
Limited
Native
Partial
Identity-based
Discovery-based
These results reflect performance improvements achieved through the use of Corma for SaaS management and automation.
Automation
employees onboarded and offboarded automatically
Time spent
spent less with Corma per week for management
Cost Efficiency
saved monthly by optimizing SaaS licences
Implementation Requirements Overview
Getting either platform up and running requires different levels of commitment and resources.
Corma Setup:
- Deployment timeline typically measured in days to weeks for SMBs
- Integration with existing identity providers and HR systems
- Configuration of RBAC policies and approval workflows
- User training focused on self-service access requests
- Ongoing maintenance primarily automated through the platform
Zluri Setup:
- Deployment timeline typically measured in days to weeks for SMBs
- Integration with existing identity providers and HR systems
- Configuration of RBAC policies and approval workflows
- User training focused on self-service access requests
- Ongoing maintenance primarily automated through the platform
Pricing and Business Model
The pricing reflects each platform’s target audience:
Corma:Designed for growing IT teams and mid-sized organizations, Corma focuses on delivering ROI through automated SaaS governance, license optimization, and operational efficiency. Pricing is available on request and structured to remain accessible without the overhead or complexity of enterprise-heavy platforms.
Zluri:Pricing for Zluri is available on request and typically provided as a custom quote based on factors like organization size, number of SaaS apps, integrations, and feature needs. Third‑party sources note that Zluri does not publicly list fixed pricing and advises contacting sales or booking a demo to get a tailored quote.
What makes Corma’s approach to SaaS license management more secure than Zluri’s?
Corma focuses heavily on identity and access management with automated compliance checks, ensuring tight control over who accesses software — key for regulatory standards like GDPR and ISO.
How do Corma and Zluri differ in handling SaaS spend visibility and cost control?
While both offer cost management tools, Corma provides a simplified license administration that directly cuts waste, whereas Zluri emphasizes detailed spend analytics often needing extra integrations.
Can Corma help my organization stay compliant with European data privacy laws better than Zluri?
Yes, Corma’s data is hosted exclusively within the EU, designed to meet strict GDPR requirements, unlike Zluri, which primarily stores data in the US.
Which platform scales better for small to medium businesses aiming to streamline SaaS governance?
Corma offers a cost-effective, streamlined solution tailored for SMEs, whereas Zluri’s complexity and pricing often suit larger enterprises with extensive SaaS portfolios.
