Corma versus Zygon
Looking for a more holistic alternative to Zygon?
Choosing the right access management platform can mean the difference between seamless security operations and compliance nightmares. With SaaS sprawl inflating IT expenses by 20-30% and shadow IT accounting for up to 40% of enterprise software, security teams need robust solutions to regain visibility and control over their digital identities.
.png)
Zygon, founded in 2023 and headquartered in Paris, France, provides cloud-based identity governance solutions, offering automated account provisioning, access reviews, and identity security across multiple applications to help IT and security teams streamline operations, reduce risks, and maintain compliance.
Mid-size and large enterprises
2023 in Paris
The Comparison
Corma’s enterprise deployment process involves careful planning and configuration to handle complex organizational structures. This approach ensures the platform aligns perfectly with existing security policies but requires dedicated IT resources.
Zygon’s plug-and-play approach delivers different results. Users report completing setup in hours with verification successful waiting times measured in minutes rather than days. The platform provides instant results, making it ideal for teams that need to implement access control quickly.
Enterprise implementation cycle
Hours to minutes
Requires IT team involvement
Self-service capable
Infrastructure planning needed
Minimal requirements
Phased rollout
Three minutes to comprehensive inventory
Formal onboarding
Intuitive, minimal training
These results reflect performance improvements achieved through the use of Corma for SaaS management and automation.
Automation
employees onboarded and offboarded automatically
Time spent
spent less with Corma per week for management
Cost Efficiency
saved monthly by optimizing SaaS licences
Implementation and Setup
Understanding what each platform requires helps ensure smooth deployment and adoption.
Corma Setup:
- Dedicated IT resources for implementation planning
- Enterprise infrastructure compatibility assessment
- Technical expertise for configuration and customization
- Defined organizational hierarchy and role structures
- Integration mapping for existing systems
- Change management process for user adoption
Zygon Setup:
- Administrative access to connected applications
- Basic understanding of access governance concepts
- User training sessions (typically brief given intuitive design)
- Application inventory preparation (can be time-consuming for legacy setups)
- Stakeholder alignment on access policies
Pricing and Business Model
Understanding what each platform requires helps ensure smooth deployment and adoption.
The pricing reflects each platform’s target audience:
Corma:Designed for growing IT teams and mid-sized organizations, Corma focuses on delivering ROI through automated SaaS governance, license optimization, and operational efficiency. Pricing is available on request and structured to remain accessible without the overhead or complexity of enterprise-heavy platforms.
Zygon: Designed for small to mid-sized organizations and IT teams looking for streamlined SaaS and identity management, Zygon delivers value through easy-to-use SaaS governance, role automation, and modern identity controls. With transparent per-user pricing starting at $3/month, Zygon provides essential SaaS management features, while advanced identity governance options are available at $6/month. The pricing is structured to remain accessible and scalable, without the complexity or overhead of enterprise-heavy platforms.
Which scales better for SMBs?
Corma is streamlined for SMEs; Zygon suits larger or hybrid IT environments.
Can Corma help with EU data privacy better than Zygon?
Yes, Corma’s EU-hosted controls meet GDPR; Zygon focuses on identity lifecycle.
How do Corma and Zygon differ on spend control?
Corma reduces license waste directly; Zygon tracks access but not SaaS spend.
What makes Corma more secure than Zygon?
Corma focuses on SaaS identity and access controls; Zygon emphasizes broader identity governance.
